Home  Business Lines  Corporate Bond Rating

ÇÁ¸°Æ®

Introduction

Entities that issue unsecured corporate bonds to raise long-term financing for more than a year are obliged to get credit ratings from licensed credit rating agencies and submit the ratings. The goal of such system is to protect investors who lack information about issuers and to induce appropriate bond prices in the capital market.
Korea Investors Service evaluates the long-term creditworthiness of corporate bond issuers and assigns ratings accordingly.

Objects and Benefits

All unsecured bonds except treasury bonds, bonds guaranteed by the national government, municipal bonds, and Bank of Korea¡¯s Currency Stabilization Bonds have to be rated by licensed credit rating agencies to be included in trust assets of banks and investment trust companies. Therefore, companies, consumer finance companies, securities companies, commercial banks, Korea Development Bank, government-funded companies, and pension funds are obliged to get credit ratings from licensed credit rating agencies when they issue unsecured bonds.
Corporate bond ratings are used for investment decisions and to determine the conditions for the bond issuance. Corporate bond ratings are also used as a basis for marking-to-market of bonds included in funds that are subject to marking-to-market obligations. In addition to these basic utilities, corporate bond ratings are utilized for the following purposes as well:

  • Financial institutions such as banks and consumer finance companies utilize corporate bond ratings in their credit evaluation
  • Institutional investors including investment trust companies and funds utilize corporate bond ratings as a basis for their investment decisions
  • Government agencies and government-funded companies such as the Public Procurement Service and Korea Electric Power Corporation use corporate bond ratings as a criterion in screening suppliers and contractors
  • Companies use corporate bond ratings as a basis for estimating creditworthiness of their counterparties in various transactions
  • Financial institutions and companies use corporate bond ratings as a basis in determining interest rates(or yields)

Types of Rating

Corporate bond rating is classified into Plenary Rating, Preliminary Rating, Periodic Rating, and Occasional Rating.

  • Plenary Rating : Plenary rating is the initial assignment of rating, which is carried out upon receiving a request from an issuer whose plan for bond issuance has been finalized
  • Preliminary Rating : Preliminary rating is assignment of rating under the assumption that the company issues unsecured bond. Preliminary rating evaluates the company¡¯s current ability to repay unsecured bond.
  • Periodic Rating : Periodic rating is formal review of a rating that that is conducted after the rating is released. Periodic rating is conducted once a year based on the latest financial results.
  • Occasional Rating : Occasional rating is review of a rating that is conducted whenever there is a significant event that may affect the rating. The goal of occasional rating is to communicate updated credit information to the market in a timely manner.
    Watchlist system is also managed through occasional rating.

Rating Scale and Definitions

Corporate bond rating uses a scale that is composed of 10 broad rating categories from AAA to D that indicate different levels of debt service ability. AAA through BBB ratings are classified as investment grade, which indicates adequate debt service ability, whereas BB through C ratings are classified as speculative grade, which indicates substantial vulnerability to changes in the external environment.


Valid Period and Disclosure of Corporate Bond Ratings

Corporate bond ratings are valid through the maturity of the rated bonds.
Corporate bond rating and the rating opinion are attached to marketable securities registration form. Corporate bond ratings are also released through official disclosure channels including KOSCOM, Korea Stock Exchange, Korea Securities Dealers¡¯ Association, Bloomberg, Reuters, Yonhap News, and major institutional investors and media.

Watchlist and Outlook

Watchlist

Korea Investors Service introduced Watchlist system on November 1, 1998, which was the first among Korean credit rating agencies. Watchlist is used to indicate that a rating is placed under review for a possible rating change to incorporate changes in factors that affect the issuer¡¯s credit standing. Many credit rating agencies in the world including Moody¡¯s Investors Service are using a watch list as an important part of their credit rating process to meet the need of the market for timely rating updates. When a rating is placed on Watchlist, the direction of expected change (¡®Possible Upgrade¡¯, ¡®Possible Downgrade¡¯, and ¡®Direction Uncertain¡¯) is also posted.

Directions of Expected Change

  • Possible Upgrade: When there are factors that warrant potential rating upgrade
  • Possible Downgrade: When there factors that warrant potential rating downgrade
  • Direction Uncertain: When there are factors that warrant potential rating change but the direction is unclear

Outlook

Outlook system was introduced on September 1, 2002. Outlook indicates mid-to-long term (six months to 18 months) prospect on major rating factors at the time the rating is assigned.
Outlook is managed separately from the rating and notch. The direction of actual rating change does not necessarily the same as the direction of Outlook. Outlook is assigned on only long-term ratings. Outlook is not assigned on CP ratings, structure finance ratings, ratings on debts that are currently in default, and ratings of issuers that are subject to corporate workout programs or the Corporate Restructuring Promotion Act. Outlook is not assigned to credits that are on the Watchlist

Rating Outlook

  • Positive : Factors that have significant bearing on the current rating (macroeconomic factors, competitive structure in the industry, and characteristics of the issuer) are expected to change for the better in the future.
  • Stable : Factors that have significant bearing on the current rating are expected to maintain their current status.
  • Negative : Factors that have significant bearing on the current rating are expected to change for the worse in the future.
  • Developing : Factors that have significant bearing on the current rating are expected to change, but the direction of the expected change is not certain.
top